Sort de documënt: Revista Ladinia
Titul: Das Kollektiveigentum im italienischen und im österreichischen Recht am Beispiel von Cadore und Anpezo
Das Kollektiveigentum im italienischen und im österreichischen Recht am Beispiel von Cadore und Anpezo
D’Alfonso Masarié, Edoardo
Descriziun: Ladinia XLIX, 161–208
https://doi.org/10.54218/ladinia.49.161-208
Ressumé
L’articul analisëia le status y le svilup storich dla proprieté coletiva sön l’ejëmpl dles Regoles tles valades dolomitiches dl Ciadura y d’Ampëz. Tl zënter él le tëmp danter le 16ejim secul y la Pröma vera mondiala, olache chëstes comunités alpines ê te n raiun de contat danter deplü sistems iuridichs. Te n raiun limité dal punt d’odüda geografich á n sistem de proprieté coletiva, che ê tl pröm unitar, incunté dui ordinamënc statai desvalis y é spo gnü integré. La rezeziun y l’interaziun danter formes coletives de proprieté y chedri normatifs statai ê condizionada da döes carateristiches zentrales: periferia – na destanza spaziala dai zëntri respetifs de referimënt – y sintopia – la continuaziun paralela de n sistem iuridich y de proprieté che ê n iade omogen te contesć statai desfarënc, mantignin inant relaziuns de barat danter i raiuns de rezeziun.
Tl Ciadura é le carater alodial di bëgns comunitars gnü defenü cun suzes cuntra i sforc de zentralisaziun dla Republica de Aunejia tl 17ejim y 18ejim secul. Cun la dominaziun napoleonica ál indere metü man n prozes de uniformaziun statala dl dërt, che s’á intensifiché cun l’afermaziun dl Stat nazional talian. De conseguënza á le vedl ordinamënt iuridich coletif ma suravit te na manira framentara. Elemënc singui s’á mantigní olache les costelaziuns metaiuridiches – sciöche les condiziuns sozio-economiches o topografiches – ê plü adatades. Ala fin dl 19ejim secul él gnü a s’al dé la poscibilité da integré i contignüs y les strotöres terminologiches dles vedles Regoles te statuc comunai nüs – n prozes che ê l’unica opziun por podëi porté inant i vedli chedri normatifs tl cheder normatif dl Stat nazional talian.
Ampëz, che ê dal 1511 incá sot la dominaziun asburgica y despartí dal Ciadura, ê insciö rové te na interaziun cun n’atra dominaziun, che s’á bel plan trasformé te n ordinamënt statal. Bele tl 18ejim secul y indô tl 19ejim secul, do la parentesa napoleonica, â l’Austria ciaré da ti jí do a na politica rigorosa che despartiss les funziuns aministratives publiches dal’organisaziun patrimoniala dles comunités locales. N reconescimënt formal dles Regoles é impormó gnü a s’al dé do che dötes les funziuns publiches ê passades ales istituziuns statales. Avisa chësta despartiziun consecuënta danter l’eserzize dl’autorité publica y le patrimone di ënc locai á cherié la lerch strotorala por la continuité dles Regoles y le mantignimënt de gran pert de sü bëgns.
This essay examines the status and historical development of collective property through the example of the Regoles in the Dolomite valleys of Cadore and Anpezo. It focuses on the period from the sixteenth century to the First World War, during which these communities constituted a contact zone between different legal regimes. In this geographically confined area, a previously uniform system of communal property encountered two distinct state orders and was gradually integrated into them. The interaction between collective property systems and emerging state structures in these regions was marked by both peripheral status and syntopy – i.e., the spatial remoteness from heartlands coupled with the continued existence of a formerly uniform communal property system within diverging legal frameworks, all while maintaining reciprocal influence.
In Cadore, the allodial nature of communal property was successfully defended against the centralising policies of the Venetian Republic during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. However, the Napoleonic period inaugurated an era of state-driven legal homogenisation, a process that continued under the Italian nation-state. As a result, the traditional legal order of collective property only partially endured. Certain elements persisted where metajuridical conditions were favourable. By the late nineteenth century, the substance and terminology of the historic Regoles were integrated into some new municipal statutes – this being the only form of legal continuity permitted under the institutional constraints imposed by the Italian state.
Anpezo, part of Habsburg Lands since 1511 and hence separated from Cadore, came into contact with a different authority that evolved into a state legal system. From the eighteenth century onwards – and continuing into the nineteenth century after the Napoleonic interregnum – Austria systematically pursued a policy of disentangling public administrative functions over local communities from the patrimonial authority. Within this framework, the Regoles were only formally recognised once all public governance functions had been transferred to state-run institutions. This clear demarcation between public authority and communal property enabled the Regoles in Anpezo to survive and retain a substantial portion of their assets.
https://doi.org/10.54218/ladinia.49.161-208
Ressumé
L’articul analisëia le status y le svilup storich dla proprieté coletiva sön l’ejëmpl dles Regoles tles valades dolomitiches dl Ciadura y d’Ampëz. Tl zënter él le tëmp danter le 16ejim secul y la Pröma vera mondiala, olache chëstes comunités alpines ê te n raiun de contat danter deplü sistems iuridichs. Te n raiun limité dal punt d’odüda geografich á n sistem de proprieté coletiva, che ê tl pröm unitar, incunté dui ordinamënc statai desvalis y é spo gnü integré. La rezeziun y l’interaziun danter formes coletives de proprieté y chedri normatifs statai ê condizionada da döes carateristiches zentrales: periferia – na destanza spaziala dai zëntri respetifs de referimënt – y sintopia – la continuaziun paralela de n sistem iuridich y de proprieté che ê n iade omogen te contesć statai desfarënc, mantignin inant relaziuns de barat danter i raiuns de rezeziun.
Tl Ciadura é le carater alodial di bëgns comunitars gnü defenü cun suzes cuntra i sforc de zentralisaziun dla Republica de Aunejia tl 17ejim y 18ejim secul. Cun la dominaziun napoleonica ál indere metü man n prozes de uniformaziun statala dl dërt, che s’á intensifiché cun l’afermaziun dl Stat nazional talian. De conseguënza á le vedl ordinamënt iuridich coletif ma suravit te na manira framentara. Elemënc singui s’á mantigní olache les costelaziuns metaiuridiches – sciöche les condiziuns sozio-economiches o topografiches – ê plü adatades. Ala fin dl 19ejim secul él gnü a s’al dé la poscibilité da integré i contignüs y les strotöres terminologiches dles vedles Regoles te statuc comunai nüs – n prozes che ê l’unica opziun por podëi porté inant i vedli chedri normatifs tl cheder normatif dl Stat nazional talian.
Ampëz, che ê dal 1511 incá sot la dominaziun asburgica y despartí dal Ciadura, ê insciö rové te na interaziun cun n’atra dominaziun, che s’á bel plan trasformé te n ordinamënt statal. Bele tl 18ejim secul y indô tl 19ejim secul, do la parentesa napoleonica, â l’Austria ciaré da ti jí do a na politica rigorosa che despartiss les funziuns aministratives publiches dal’organisaziun patrimoniala dles comunités locales. N reconescimënt formal dles Regoles é impormó gnü a s’al dé do che dötes les funziuns publiches ê passades ales istituziuns statales. Avisa chësta despartiziun consecuënta danter l’eserzize dl’autorité publica y le patrimone di ënc locai á cherié la lerch strotorala por la continuité dles Regoles y le mantignimënt de gran pert de sü bëgns.
This essay examines the status and historical development of collective property through the example of the Regoles in the Dolomite valleys of Cadore and Anpezo. It focuses on the period from the sixteenth century to the First World War, during which these communities constituted a contact zone between different legal regimes. In this geographically confined area, a previously uniform system of communal property encountered two distinct state orders and was gradually integrated into them. The interaction between collective property systems and emerging state structures in these regions was marked by both peripheral status and syntopy – i.e., the spatial remoteness from heartlands coupled with the continued existence of a formerly uniform communal property system within diverging legal frameworks, all while maintaining reciprocal influence.
In Cadore, the allodial nature of communal property was successfully defended against the centralising policies of the Venetian Republic during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. However, the Napoleonic period inaugurated an era of state-driven legal homogenisation, a process that continued under the Italian nation-state. As a result, the traditional legal order of collective property only partially endured. Certain elements persisted where metajuridical conditions were favourable. By the late nineteenth century, the substance and terminology of the historic Regoles were integrated into some new municipal statutes – this being the only form of legal continuity permitted under the institutional constraints imposed by the Italian state.
Anpezo, part of Habsburg Lands since 1511 and hence separated from Cadore, came into contact with a different authority that evolved into a state legal system. From the eighteenth century onwards – and continuing into the nineteenth century after the Napoleonic interregnum – Austria systematically pursued a policy of disentangling public administrative functions over local communities from the patrimonial authority. Within this framework, the Regoles were only formally recognised once all public governance functions had been transferred to state-run institutions. This clear demarcation between public authority and communal property enabled the Regoles in Anpezo to survive and retain a substantial portion of their assets.
Lingaz: DE
Data: 2025
Autur: D’Alfonso Masarié, Edoardo
Copyright: Istitut Ladin Micurá de Rü - ISSN 1124-1004
